This is the Face of Jewish Vengeance?
Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” may be the first ‘pro-Semitic’ film. Which makes it as bad as it’s opposite. His anti-Nazi bloodbath may just be one more justification for the anti-Arab bloodbaths that Israel is so fond of. Once again, the tragedies of the Holocaust might provide just the superhero image the Zionist’s need for their murderous ‘might makes right’ policies……
Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord. But that Old Testament saw is conveniently overlooked in the Jewish State. Vengeance is – according to Israel’s behavior – a uniquely Jewish prerogative.
And the latest film by Tarantino is , at day’s end, is little more than Zionist porn; a palate of images for IDF jerkoff sessions.
The film works as a cross between Dr. Strangelove, and a thrash metal version of “Springtime for Hitler” but raises serious questions about hate, murder, revenge and genocide. Part of me doesn’t believe Mr. Tarantino thought all that much about it. The fact that this film garnered Academy Award nominations means, to this reviewer, that much of his shtick in this twisted film is taken at face value.
After all, who doesn’t hate the Nazis? Don’t answer that, or you’ll end up on a list. Only an unconditional agreement here will save your ass. Sometimes kneejerk reactions can save your reputation, if not your life. But I have serious questions after watching this flick.
Yes, Naziism is wrong. And so is Zionism. But to make a movie where nearly anyone wearing a German uniform is shot, stabbed or bludgeoned into worm meat, is as fair or realistic as making a movie where everyone living in Israel is just another fascist Zionist corpse in waiting. The generalization as the open door to genocide.
Don’t get me wrong. The movie has moments of great filmmaking. Then again, so does Triumph of the Will. It scares me when I think this movie probably went over well in the US. Clearly well enough for the Academy to give it a nod. And yet, why does an uber-Jewish filmmaker like Mel Brooks end up bitch-slapping the Nazis far better and with less black-hearted psychopathology in To Be or Not to Be, than this latest Tarantino offering? I get the impression we are expected to be Pavlovian dupes to anything Nazi, which translates as forgoing our humanity when it comes to one of the most inhuman regimes in the history of mankind. The inhuman regime, wherever it is , however , is peopled by human beings and this message is lost in Quentin’s latest. There is precious little humanity in this film. There is, to make up for it, a shitload of hatred and revenge and murderous rage.
I might be missing the point here when I say I don’t blame Tarantino solely for this exercise in hate-porn. I just think that graphic footage of a NY Jew fighting in World War II, with a squadron of specially enlisted Jewish troops, taking a baseball bat to a Nazi platoon leader who refuses to talk is far too loaded with pro-US (a baseball bat?) and pro-Jewish bloodlust to be considered a valid statement worthy of any thought or discussion. If one wished to show the rage, the dark hatred and the need, yes need, for revenge over the genocidal horrors of WWII, one could do it far better and with more humanity.
In a brilliant film moment, and a miserable moment for human values, a ghostly face appears upon a cinema screen starting to go up in flames, intoning “This is the face of Jewish vengeance.” Watching it, I get chills for all the wrong reasons. It could just as easily be an image of Der Fuhrer’s welcome to Auchwitz video, FDR’s YouTube clip to the people of Hiroshima, or Bin Laden’s video feed to passengers onboard planes that would soon melt three thousand people into hydrocarbons…….and maybe that’s just my problem. No matter how much I drink, I can’t drown the part of me that finds humanity in every human being, however crippled or warped or turned in on itself. I can’t find justification for barbaric cruelty and violence. Harsh punishment, even corporal punishment ? Yes. But , a baseball bat ? Scalping the dead? Firing hundreds of rounds into someone long dead? That just stinks of pathetic and sophomoric revenge fantasies that give pathetic, sophomoric barbarians a hard on. Like I said before……….hate porn. The Nazis were connoisseurs of that. Somewhere in the top ten list of hate porn addicts though, we find Zionists. You’ve come a long way baby.
Not.
None of this, mind you, is the reaction of a sensitive and PC driven individual. I just think that such twisted metaphors and fantasies of revenge have been done better and with more creativity than this latest Tarantino outing. This movie could have been a brilliant tour-de-force if it were fortunate enough to have someone like Pynchon or Chayevsky writing the screenplay. Talk about writers who can offend everyone equally? In a plot like this one, simply doing a pedestrian and superficial take on the layers and complexes of anger, grief and horror that mark the Holocaust of World War II is so distant from the issues that should be raised in a film making the claims this one does. The end result is that the film is more anti-American than anti-Nazi. Americans wielding baseball bats are hardly the moral superiors of Nazis dropping cans of Zyclon B down the shower vents in death camps. If that last sentence offends you, I suggest you look at how conditioned you’ve been to regard the Jewish Shoah as the most tragic of tragedies and how you can then define all those other horrors beneath the only holocaust we are supposed to spell with a capital H. Then I suggest you explain your pet Holocaust theories to the Armenians, the Russians under Stalin, the Cambodians, the Chinese, the Chileans, the Rwandans and the Salvadorans. Go on. I’ll wait.
Personally, if I were hiding from machetes in a church in Rwanda, or forced to contribute my skull to a museum exhibit in Cambodia? I wouldn’t give a flying fuck about six million Jews out of the twenty million plus that were killed as the Third Reich engines of death rolled on. But that’s me. Sorry, that I don’t see the second world war as a uniquely Jewish experience, but then, I live in a country that saw one thousand, two hundred or more dead from a month long onslaught from the Israeli military. And that was only a few years ago. And that hate storm only lasted a month.
Bottom line? No one should be marked for death. No one should be marked for life. No one should be marked at all by others who don’t know the value of a single human life and the secrets that a single human heart can contain. And? no one is more precious in death than another simply because one of the dead was part of a campaign against ‘their kind’ because the bottom line? We’re all one kind, mankind ……. while Tom Waits might be right in singing “the one thing you can say about mankind is , there’s nothing kind about man…” he wasn’t advocated taking off anyones head with a baseball bat, or frying a packed movie house audience to death. Or condoning an anachronistic precursor to suicide bombing. If anything, Mr. Tarantino’s latest simply proves Mr. Waits was right, in one respect……
As a race? We’re fucked.
The fact that “This is the face of Jewish Vengeance” is a line from the movie makes me wary of all things Zionist much more than ever. Next time the swines of Zion launch a ‘you’re either with us or against us “ or another ‘never again’ propaganda video to justify their inhuman strikes against another people? I’m far more likely to discount the so-called human elements of Zionism and simply drop its xenophobic and fascist ideology in a trashcan next to Naziism. Way to go, Quentin. I just wonder if you realize whose creature you have become.
